|
Salt Manufacture and Trade from the Perspective of Avery Island, Louisiana
Ian W. Brown
pp. 113-151
Salt is one of the invisible items of trade. In the Eastern Woodlands
there are a number of excellent descriptions of historic Indians making
and trading salt, but these activities are difficult to trace archaeologically.
Research conducted at several saline sites in the midcontinent has
revealed the intensity of salt production within the last millennium,
but because it is so hard to identify the means of transport, it is
difficult to evaluate the impact of salt trade on areas outside of
salines. This paper addresses the prehistoric importance of salt production
at the Salt Mine Valley site (16Ib23) on Avery Island, Louisiana. The
focus of the discussion is on the Petite Anse phase component revealed
in Locale 5. This protohistoric phase is believed to reflect the movement
of people, possibly related to the Tunica, Taënsa, or Koroa Indians,
to coastal Louisiana for the prime purpose of producing salt for trade.
The Enigma of Saskatchewan Blackduck: Pottery from the Hanson (FgNi-50)
and Hokness (FgNi-51) Sites
David Meyer, Margaret Hanna, and Doug Frey
pp. 153-175
Blackduck pottery is uncommon in Saskatchewan, having been recovered
from 10 sites, almost all in the northern boreal forest zone. In most
cases only one or two vessels are represented. The recovery of sherds
representing five Blackduck vessels from the Hanson and Hokness sites,
two adjacent sites in the aspen parklands of central Saskatchewan, must
therefore be considered significant. The Hanson and Hokness vessels are
thicker and have less consolidated paste than is usual in Blackduck found
farther to the east, although the decorative motifs are generally the
same. However, their coarser features are consistent with Saskatchewan
Blackduck pottery in general. This consistency is taken as evidence that
this pottery was produced in the context of an established cultural tradition
in this region and is not simply a result of trade or the occasional
in-movement of outsiders.
Oneota End Scrapers and Experiments in Hide Dressing: An Analysis from
the La Crosse Locality
Robert F. Boszhardt and Joelle McCarthy
pp. 177-199
End scrapers are common artifacts at many late prehistoric Oneota tradition
sites, particularly on the eastern margins of the Great Plains. Such
tools are relatively scarce at Oneota sites nearer the Great Lakes. This
distribution suggests that scrapers may be associated with bison hide
dressing. This pattern is supported by point/scraper indices from site
assemblages across the Prairie Peninsula. Analysis of wear on end scrapers
from Oneota archaeological contexts and on a series used in experimental
hide preparation indicates that Oneota scrapers from La Crosse, Wisconsin,
locality sites were used for dry-hide working. These results imply that
Oneota groups returning from communal bison hunts on the "Little
Prairies" of southern Minnesota brought back not only bison scapulas
for hoes, but also dry hides for final processing at La Crosse.
A Temporal and Spatial Analysis of the Parker Festooned Ceramic Type
Timothy J. Abel
pp. 201-256
The Parker Festooned ceramic type has been called "the most garish
ceramic form in the Great Lakes area." Indeed, due to its unique
motif, it is easily recognized in any Great Lakes ceramic assemblage.
Over the years, however, the concept has grown vague and ambiguous-due
in large part to increasingly inclusive generalizations that lack accurate
seriation data. At this point, Parker Festooned is perhaps the least
understood, yet most widely known, of all the ceramic types present in
the Great Lakes. Recent research has begun to tackle the immense job
of seriating Parker Festooned. Before that can begin, however, it is
essential that we adopt a consistent definition of the type. This article
proposes a new taxonomic model that gives renewed perspective to the
Parker Festooned ceramic type by clearly showing its temporal and spatial
dynamics within seven northwest Ohio assemblages.
| ©2003
Midwest Archaeological Conference Comments? |
|